It may be a port of the DS game, but Atlus has assured us it is in no way a quick and half-assed effort to bring the DS game to the Wii. It has new graphics and new missions, which is everything on paper making it out to be a new game experience. Has Atlus succeeded or did gamers have enough of surgery on their DS? The critics say:- IGN - 80%: "Putting aside the fact that Second Opinion is a retelling of the DS version, the game is absolutely perfect as an introductory game for Wii players. There's a ton of diversity in the missions, an all-new Hard mode for previous fans of the series, and an entirely new sixth chapter of the game to appease the "been there, done that" attitude of the hardcore crowd."
- GameSpot - 80%: "This is about as unorthodox of a launch title for a new game system as they come, but then again, the Wii is pretty unorthodox too. So maybe it shouldn't come as any surprise that the game and the console make a great match. Trauma Center: Second Opinion isn't going to wow anybody with its presentation, yet it's got so much inventive gameplay and takes such a spirited approach to its subject matter that it still stands out from the crowd."
- 1UP - 65%: "Don't let the score dissuade you from playing the game. It is enjoyable. Actually, it reminds me of that college professor who taught a fun class but didn't explain things very well -- in the end, you didn't learn as much as you could have. Second Opinion's fun, but in the end, you feel like you didn't enjoy it as much as you should have."













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-17-2006 @ 2:55PM
SyChO said...
Sup guys,
Is it me or are every review/ratings from "1UP" always so much lower then other publications?
Is it because they don't know games, they know them to well or they are just too freaking hard on their markings?
Later
Reply
11-17-2006 @ 4:15PM
Steinegal said...
Well they gave Zelda:TP a perfect 10 out of 10:D
Would like to see the score go higher than that:P
Reply
11-17-2006 @ 6:01PM
Shogan said...
Maybe they are reviewing based on 1-100, meaning 65 would be better than average. A 65 from the major sites would mean the game was an almost unplayable abomination.
Reply
11-17-2006 @ 8:25PM
Josh said...
Most sites go by the school grading system, so anything below a 70 is a failure.
That said, I'm really looking forward to this game. :P
Reply