
Are you guys buying shooters? Are you happy with the selection? Are you all zap zap zap and pew pew pew at the bad spaceships?




| Name | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| King of Fighters: Orochi Saga |
Nov 25 |
|
| Ultimate Band |
Nov 25 | |
| Mushroom Men |
Dec 2 |
|
| Iron Chef America | Dec 5 | |
| Rock Band 2 |
Dec 16 | |
| Ultimate Shooting Collection |
Dec 16 | |
| Neopets Puzzle Adventure |
Dec 30 |
|
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-16-2007 @ 10:22AM
Xzyliac said...
I like a good shump I won't lie even if the ones I REALLY grew up on (where is my Metroid...wait can we call that a shooter? Hmmm..) they still entertain and I am sure someone out there is eating his/her heart out. But personally I'd prefer some RPGs. Traditional titles like FF to less traditional like a certain Nintendo RPG whose name slipped my mind (wait was it Earthbound? Something..it had Ness in it but the name I forgot!). Fighters and more party like games from the N64 era seem to have been forgotten as well.
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 10:47AM
hvnlysoldr said...
Was Ness just in Earthbound a.k.a. Mother 2 in Japan?
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 10:58AM
ViralArtist said...
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6489/starwarsbattlefrontpewpmy9.jpg
pew pew etc...
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 11:52AM
Crazylink said...
I love shooters, but I don't like paying for them. I get my fix from all the great freeware games on the interwebs.
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 12:34PM
acKK said...
I bought R-Type III. That game was and still is one of the greatest games (not just shooters) I've ever played. Difficult, yet enjoyable, kickass soundtrack, sensible upgrades which give tactical flavor, awesome bosses... besides I rule at it and my friends don't, which is hilarious fun when watching them play.
For the other shooters I don't care that much, am rather taking any Zelda or Metroid game thx.
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 1:38PM
DA said...
No RPG? There are 3 Zeldas.
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 1:43PM
fo said...
what game is that picture from?
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 2:12PM
Matt said...
I don't mind it tooo much. I think shooters can be a lot more fun since they're quick "pick it up and play" experiences. From the virtual console, at least, I think those are TYPICALLY the games that remained the most fun over the years. However, there are obvious exceptions to that rule. No one wants to go another week without Chrono Trigger, Super Mario RPG, and Secret of Mana. Also, I've personally never played Earthbound, I'd love to try it out.
Nintendo needs to start filtering through some RPGs, primarily, although other genres should be included. The shooters are good to get a wide group of gamers playing, but my guess is Nintendo wanted to release more of the quick-to-beat games, because from a marketing standpoint, they wanted to popularize the Virtual Console now, before releasing that "Well, there's only one game I'm going to buy for the Virtual Console when it comes out" type of game...
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 3:12PM
Comstock said...
I'm loving the shooters. They are some of the only games I've bought on the VC. I'd love to see many more, and I can't think of any reason we shouldn't. Are the genres in competition for limited space or something? Why does it have to be shmups or RPGs? Why not any and all?
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 4:04PM
Almadi said...
It's not the amount, but the selection. Got burned on nostalgia too many times (Mario Kart 64 and Alex Kidd).
My top 5 shooters I'm hoping to see on the VC in 2007, these are the shooters that stood the test of time:
http://madiart.blogspot.com/2007/05/top-5-na-on-vc.html
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 6:00PM
Ghen said...
Shooters are almost always very low bandwidth. RPGs are the biggest so its no surprise they didn't release any. Besides, maybe they're waiting to charge a premium for RPGs.
Reply
6-16-2007 @ 6:15PM
JC Fletcher said...
@7: It's from Blazing Lazers, of course.
Reply
6-17-2007 @ 3:01AM
Lightfoot said...
For some of the RPGs mentioned, does Square/Enix have any games on the VC? With the exception of Nintendo's Earthbound, and Capcom's Breath of Fire games, Square and Enix (who have since merged) made most of the English RPGs that appeared on the classic Nintendo systems. Square even made Mario RPG if I remember correctly.
There are though the RPGs that appeared on the Sega and NEC systems.
Reply
6-17-2007 @ 5:03AM
Feedback said...
I reiterate. VC needs more Goldeneye64. It would be even more awesome if it had online play.
Reply
6-17-2007 @ 6:10AM
Matisfaction said...
I think this has come to attention due to the fact that most of the best games for the PCEngine/TG-16 were shoot'em ups.
It's a shame that the PCEngine version of Gradius hasn't been released for VC instead of the NES version as the PCE version is far superior, just as a lot of the SEGA arcade conversions (Outrun, Shinobi, Altered Beast etc.) on the PCE eclipse the megadrive ports.
I'd also like to see the PCE versions of Ghouls & Ghosts & Street Fighter CE on VC.
Reply
6-17-2007 @ 3:48PM
Hoop said...
Now that I have Blazing Lazers , i need no more shooters... my TG16 has been hooked up continuously since I got then game .. No im serious .. since like 1990.
Blazing Lazers on the VC now finally lets my TG16 have a break
Now Gimme SMB:A FF2&3, KI, MK2,and SFII:turbo on SNES and Cobra Triangle on NES.
i hope one day i can get AvP: Atari jaguar on VC so i can retire that machine too.
Reply
6-18-2007 @ 4:25PM
vanessa said...
Oh please I hope someone can help me - I know it isnt...but it looks like a screenshot from a sega game....I cant for the life of me remember what it was called but you would bomb the screen and a skull would come up in the background.....
ANYONE????
Reply
6-18-2007 @ 4:26PM
JC Fletcher said...
Truxton. That screenshot was everywhere in old Genesis marketing!
Reply
6-19-2007 @ 12:45PM
vanessa said...
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Now WHEN will that be on the VC
Reply