My, is this Manhunt 2-themed Wii ever disgusting. If not for the fact that the Manhunt 2 logo is clearly visible, and the nominal stickering of the Nunchuk, it would look pretty much just like a blood-stained Wii. And Rockstar is betting that you'll find that cool enough to enter their Radio Rebellion Sweepstakes.
They're probably right, anyway. Limited-edition anything is a good way to get people's interest. Or free anything, for that matter. Did we mention you also get a 50" plasma TV?
While the Wii may not match our usual aesthetic, we still think it's a cool idea for a bizarre giveaway item, and another chance for Rockstar to capture some of the controversy they need to push copies of their game. Maybe later they'll release this as a skin for people who want the look, but already have a Wii. Or, we suppose, you could do it the old-fashioned way.
[Via GamesRadar]
Rockstar's M-rated Wii console
Posted Oct 4th 2007 11:20AM by JC Fletcher
Filed under: News
Related Headlines
- Murder training for cheap at Amazon (Yesterday - 5 Comments)
- Byron calls for more BBFC action, ratings system overhaul (50 days ago - 5 Comments)
- Many call for BBFC to step aside from games following Manhunt 2 ordeal (57 days ago - 4 Comments)
- The Manhunt is back on in the UK (63 days ago - 3 Comments)
- GTA IV usurps Ocarina of Time (16 days ago - 89 Comments)












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-04-2007 @ 12:23PM
Michael C. Sherrin said...
Wow, that looks just my Wii console after my parents came over and criticized me for spending so much on video games...uh, I think I've said too much.
*******
Michael C. Sherrin
http://www.prodigeek.com/
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 12:35PM
Dr. Reverend Shmoove, PhD said...
this thing is definitely banned in england
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 12:45PM
JIB said...
Hey guys, lets win a TV that we cant play our Wii on because of image burn.
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 1:27PM
vidGuy said...
I entered the contest yesterday. It looks like the sales tax on the grand prize would be above $300, so 'winning' this could be pretty expensive. Personally, that Wii doesn't look that exciting, so I'd probably sell it to pay off the tax - free 50" plasma!
JIB, I played the Wii for 30 to 40 hours on a plasma TV over the summer, no image burn whatsoever.
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 1:55PM
ELIJAH said...
THIS IS WRONG ON HOW THE GOVERNMENT WOULD TAX US IF WE WON.
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 2:08PM
vidGuy said...
Why? Taxation is placed on all earnings of this kind. Whether you win the lottery, win prizes on The Price Is Right, or simply earn interest on savings bonds, you pay tax on it.
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 2:12PM
Mandabar said...
Damn... What happens when I win this... and can't afford to win this?
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 2:20PM
JIB said...
Well then, thats good to know seeing how Im thinking of buying an HDTV. BTW were you using the component cable?
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 3:22PM
vidGuy said...
Yep, got an official Nintendo component cable for $5.99 on sale online somewhere months back. It definitely makes a difference on the HDTV, though the Wii does look more aliased with the pixels blown up like that. But playing MP3 in progressive scan 16:9 on 50" was still REALLY impressive!
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 3:56PM
Fullmetal Salchemist said...
If you're not old enough to understand how taxes work (yes, you have to pay taxes on winnings), then you're not old enough to play Manhunt.
"M for mature" not "M for 'My mom drives me to middle school.'"
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 4:06PM
Kev said...
"M for mature" not "M for 'My mom drives me to middle school.'"
Best comment I've seen all day. :)
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 4:17PM
Jeremy said...
I want blood and guts on my Wii. But the look would only work for this time of year. Now the winning things and paying tax on it is true to an extent. I have won some things and didn't have to pay taxes on it. I think the value of the winnings has to be over a certain amount before taxes are charged. Just look at the lottery If you win like a hundred bucks then I have never had to pay taxes on it but if you hit a big jackpot like a grand or so then yeah you are taxed.
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 4:54PM
mian said...
@#10
Just because something works a certain doesn't make it right. Taxation on earnings is disruptive to economic development in a way that taxation on spending wouldn't be. It also discourages personal savings and aids in pushing people to the edge of their viability--a la the recent sub prime crash.
Mr. All Caps does sound a bit young, but that doesn't make him wrong.
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 5:18PM
Fullmetal Salchemist said...
"THIS IS WRONG ON HOW THE GOVERNMENT WOULD TAX US IF WE WON."
Does that really strike you as the response of a person who is concerned with economic development?
Reply
10-04-2007 @ 5:33PM
vidGuy said...
Discouraging savings is exactly what we need to spur economic spending and prevent a recession. Plus, if someone is spending it someone is earning it - how can taxing one be okay but not the other?
Reply
10-06-2007 @ 8:30PM
mian said...
@14: What if he isn't? 95% of the country doesn't think in those terms. His gut reaction still has merit.
@15: While it's true that you can rack up temporary economic gains by encouraging reckless spending (a favorite of most administrations since they get to take credit for the gain and be gone before it's time to pay the piper), the negative effects like bankruptcy far outweigh the benefits. It's dangerous and reckless short-term thinking. Everyone who spreads themselves too thin eventually either takes cover in legal protections that cost the economy, or they go straight to the government for aid and assistance, and all the gains we got by getting them to max out their credit cards disappear. Money saved also doesn't disappear from the markets--usually people attempt to earn some form of return, leading to economic investment that has a long and strong impact.
Also, 1) you are somewhat wrong in saying that because you're spending money (on an annual basis--people can spend money they've earned in prior years, or money they flat out inherited at birth) you must have earned it, and 2) it is different because you get to choose what taxes to pay and WHEN. Say you can't afford the tax rates this year--you can cut down on your tax burden by cutting back on discretionary spending. Later on when things are looking up, you may choose to ramp up spending--possibly even spending money you earned in prior years. The choice provides additional incentive for people to think through their finances, and to cushion themselves rather than depending on you and me to do it for them.
On top of which people who have massive wealth (inherited from the earnings of others, for instance) but are not massive earners usually end up getting a pass on taxes since this country chooses to tax earnings on the national level.
Reply
10-08-2007 @ 1:59AM
JC Fletcher said...
This is the least shocking Manhunt 2 discussion ever.
Reply
10-08-2007 @ 1:59AM
JC Fletcher said...
I mean, seriously, you dudes could show this thread to your grandparents and they'd just be proud of you.
Reply
10-08-2007 @ 11:49AM
Jandi said...
People just love picking on suspected youngins. what kind of maturity is that? im sure i wouldnt talk to my grandchildren like that if they wanted help in their multiplication skills. what would you say, "aw, you n00b, you don't belong in this world because you were born after i was."
no one likes paying taxes. give em a break.
Reply
10-08-2007 @ 1:46PM
mian said...
@JC: Are you sure we're not grandparents? =v)
http://img103.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dale3rd3.jpg
Reply