Nintendo Wii Fanboy

nooooooooo! Screw those guys!! I hate this!!!!!!

Reply

Just another company trying to leech off of Nintendo because of their success...

Reply

There is no way the company has an actual chance. The devices are completely different, they have different functions, the design is different [not to mention Nunchuk-less], and I doubt it even uses bluetooth technology. This, my friends, is just unjust. A little company didn't try marketing their "wireless technology" and got screwed over as Nintendo released an amazing gaming system. They are just ticked off that Nintendo is intelligent to market their Wii so effectively.

Reply

Wow, I can see why they're suing. Those hands look really similar.

Reply

They don't look much alike at all. Money grubbin' bastards.


http://gameculture101.blogspot.com

Reply

Nothing to worry about, the device they are saying Nintendo "infringed" upon looks like a mouse of sorts. If you notice the device is flat upon a surface as indicated by the table and the way the diagram is holding the device. Also to note about how it is being held is that the Wii-remote is grasped whereas their invention is again held flat like a mouse.

Reply

Don't worry, nothing came of any of the lawsuits against Nintendo over the Wii infringing on other things. Nintendo wouldn't let that happen and ruin their success. With all the people infringing on Nintendo with D-Pads and Motion Sensing, their Karma is strong against these frivolous attacks.

Reply

Nintendo's gonna KILL those bastards!!! Seriously, some tiny little company facing Ninty on an unjust case?? Seriously, their device is a wireless mouse that's ort of rectangular!!! Plus if they managed to pull it off, they'd get killed by all us Nintendo fans that would boycott their shit, and they'd go out of business. Same old same old for the Big N.

Reply

freakin' patent trolls are disgusting.

Who wants to bet this is being filed in Texas?

I wonder if we'll ever have some sort of a "you sat on the patent with absolutely no effort towards bringing it to market for X years, too bad for you, your patent is forfeit" clause that we apparently desperately need.

Reply

Seriously, so freakin' tired of all these useless patent-holding companies trying to capitalize on another company's ingenious device. Nintendo should countersue. If you aren't going to use a patent (and their device looks NOTHING like a Wiimote), then you lose it. Period. There should be a 2 year expiry on these things and if no product is developed, then bye-bye patent. Enough is enough.

Big N will prevail. Always has, always will.

Reply

Booo Copper Innovations Group!!!
Everyone hates you booo!!


... yeah, immaturity is annoying, but it always feels good to let it get off your chest at something as stupid as this.

Reply

yea...no, nintendo and sony have some serious high profile lawyers, who will essentially make this lackluster case look like something from harvey birdman...p.s. i love harvey birdman, the show's genius.

Reply

Or Phoenix Wright may have to pwn them in court.

Reply

I think they're holding their original Wii remote wrong.

Reply

WHAT!?!
They are NOTHING alike, stupid company.

Reply

If THAT is all it takes to sue, my garage door opener manufacturer has a great case too. Also, the company that makes my mouse, and my TV remotes too.



Nintendo should sue themselves for stealing a sideways NES controller design. Thieving Bastards.

Reply

Does that mean that Douglas Engelbart can sue Copper Innovations Group because their device looks suspiciously like a mouse?

Just wondering.

Reply

Yeah, gotta love how not alike those two things look. That's grounds to sue if I've ever seen grounds from which someone would stand on when they sue!

Reply

Title's incorrect.... it's a patent infringement case, not a copyright infringement case.

Also, #9, while patent trolls do usually file in East Texas, the article says the suit was filed in Western Pennsylvania.

Sure looks baseless, to the point where if the company is publicly traded I would suspect a pump and dump strategy. But I haven't seen the patent and I'm not going to look.

Reply

Ppph! Huh! Funny that some stupid company is trying to sue a multibillion dollar a year interesting. This lawsuit is more stupid than those people who tried to sue McDonald's for getting fat.

Reply

I meant "industry".

Reply

This suit is not because of the looks or designs but how the controllers connect to the devices using a unique number to identify them. Also note that Microsoft was not included in this case even though they use the same wireless technology. Honestly any device that uses some form of wireless technology uses a unique identifier and the idea is so general that I doubt Copper Innovations Group even has a leg to stand on. This is no different than someone getting a patent 15 years ago on an idea of a storage device that was round and flat that uses lasers to read and write data and then now suing anyone that makes a CD or DVD. It is such a general idea that anyone could make a device work that way.

Reply